Chapter 5 – Solar System Orbits (Bode’s Law)

Orrery, simulates the scale and relative movement of the planets about the Sun
Bode’s Law
Kepler’s Orbits, demonstrates the first two of Kepler’s Laws
Orbit Foci, plotting the second focus
Comet Orbit, eccentric orbits
Halley’s Comet, depicts one complete orbit, 1948-2023
Pluto’s Orbit, plots the relative positions of Pluto and Neptune from 1880-2128, one complete orbit for Pluto
Solar Apex, corkscrew motion of a planet towards the Solar Apex.

Bode’s Law

In 1772, the German astronomer Johann Bode demonstrated that a simple mathematical progression — eg 0 + 4, 3 + 4, 6 + 4, 12 + 4,… — could explain the average distance of successive planets from the Sun — where Earth had a value of 10 (6 + 4). At the time, only six planets were known to exist, not surprisingly, they fitted reasonably well with what came to be known as ‘Bode’s Law’.

The discovery of Uranus beyond Saturn in 1781 and the minor planet Ceres, between Mars and Jupiter, in 1801 confirmed the Law by falling nicely into place. However, the discovery of Neptune in 1846 and Pluto in 1930 did not uphold the Law — Pluto occupying the orbit allocated by Bode for Neptune as the following short program demonstrates. Perhaps you can improve on Bode to provide a better explanation?

The program
The upper half of the screen LISTs and DRAWs semi-orbital arcs calculated from the variable ‘bode’ (z + 4); the lower half the actual values as READ from DATA. The display is scaled to maximum size for the DRAW routine where PI = semi-circle, and the program stops with an error message (integer out of range) in attempting to DRAW the final arc for Pluto according to Bode’s Law. Thus Neptune’s actual orbit, in the lower display, fits the space between Uranus and Neptune as allocated by Bode and shown in the upper display. Study of the numerical values displayed confirms this as Figure 5.3 shows.

Figure 5.3

Bodes_Law

Note: This program, in demonstrating Bode’s Law, refers to average distances from the Sun. Most planetary orbits are not neat circles but slightly elliptical — highly so in Pluto’s case causing it to overlap Neptune’s orbit. The program Pluto’s Orbit, later in this chapter, fully explains this situation.

10 REM Titius-Bode’s Law
20 LET x=185: LET y=88
30 LET z=0: DIM a$(32*11)
40 PRINT PAPER 6;a$; PAPER 1;a$: FLASH 1
50 PRINT AT 0,1;”Titius-Bode’s Law”
60 PRINT AT 11,1;”Actual dist”
70 FLASH 0: PAPER 6: INK 9
80 FOR n=1 TO 10
90 LET bode=z+4
100 READ p$,a
110 PRINT AT n,0;p$;TAB 8;bode
120 PRINT AT n+11,0; PAPER 1;p$;TAB 8;a
130 PLOT x-a/6,y
140 DRAW a/3,0,PI
150 PLOT x-z/6,y
160 DRAW z/3,0,-PI
170 LET z=z+z
180 IF n=1 THEN LET z=3
190 NEXT n
200 DATA “Mercury”,3.9,”Venus”,7.2,”Earth”,10,”Mars”,15.2,”Ceres”,
26.5,”Jupiter”,52,”Saturn”,95.4,”Uranus”,192,”Neptune”,301,”Pluto”,
395

Advertisements


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s